One point to consider is that turbo cars generally produce far more torque down low than N/A cars of similar capacity.
Therefore they don't have to rev as much and this places a lot less stress on the engine components in the heads. Revving high wears your heads out much faster than 100,000 of low rev action. The springs will be thrashed after 100,000 if they are revving higher all the time to get moving.
Most turbo cars also have a stronger piston/rod combination and usually better head studs as well. This means they won't be under much stress.
The question of longevity for turbo cars is tuning and boost. At a certain ratio of boost turbo engines longevity goes down a lot. Eg twice factory amount on subaru's and you have to start rebuilding the motor for head gaskets every 30k as a precaution so they don't pop.
A turbo engine is like an 80kg guy who does weights lifting 100kg vs an 80kg guy who does no exercise lifting 50kg. The guy doing 100kg will probably still do more exercise than the unfit guy (N/A). Like the turbo diesel toyota hilux's that get more than 500,000k's on their first motor before a rebuild. I know this as I used to work for toyota australia.
*Disclaimer - Don't rely on me, seek your own professional advice. Audi R8 E-tron. 230kw 4500nm! (not a typo).
Economy at 100kph =5.5L
Bookmarks