Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 43

Thread: Dynolicious

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Georges Hall
    Posts
    362
    Users Country Flag

    Stock Polo GTI's generally produce about 95kw at the wheels.
    I weighed my car on a weighbridge and it was 1220kg[cloth trim,no sunroof,1/2 tank fuel]
    Having said that,anyone who takes seriously the figures from something plugged into their cigarette lighter is on drugs....
    Cheers
    Len

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Brisvegas
    Posts
    1,508
    Quote Originally Posted by MACCAA View Post
    Having said that,anyone who takes seriously the figures from something plugged into their cigarette lighter is on drugs...
    Taking serious and having some fun are 2 different things.
    For Sale 2006 VW Polo GTI
    Have a Look
    CUSTOM CODE
    Phase 2

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    223
    Thread Starter
    "Curb weight (US) or Kerb weight (UK) is the total weight of a vehicle with standard equipment, all necessary operating consumables (e.g. motor oil and coolant), a full tank of fuel, while not loaded with either passengers or cargo.[1][2]

    This definition may differ from definitions used by governmental regulatory agencies or other organizations, for example, many European Union manufacturers include the weight of a 75 kilogram driver to follow European Directive 95/48/EC.[3] Additionally, organizations may define curb weight with fixed levels of fuel and other variables to equalize the value for the comparison of different vehicles." courtesy of wikipedia.com

    The only weight that keeps coming up for the Polo GTI is the 1190kg figure. So i guess if we round it up to 1200kg + 75kg (driver) that should give us some comparative figures.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    223
    Thread Starter
    Since i take nothing seriously then that shouldn't be a problem but to justify the 15$ i payed i think the least i could do is minimize the variables.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,207
    why does everyone get narky when I repeat what is well known. A DYNO is only usefully for comparing cars or comparing modifications to A car.

    You can take the same car and run dyno tests on different dynos and literally get quite different results.

    So... I have little time for people who say "my car got 126.3kw on the dyno". It means nothing.

    If they said...My car recorded 110kw before the mod and 117kw after the mod I would be more impressed. Thats what a dyno is for. Not for silly bragging rights. Its a tuning tool.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    223
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by pologti18t View Post
    why does everyone get narky when I repeat what is well known. A DYNO is only usefully for comparing cars or comparing modifications to A car.

    You can take the same car and run dyno tests on different dynos and literally get quite different results.

    So... I have little time for people who say "my car got 126.3kw on the dyno". It means nothing.

    If they said...My car recorded 110kw before the mod and 117kw after the mod I would be more impressed. Thats what a dyno is for. Not for silly bragging rights. Its a tuning tool.

    Who could disagree with that. And as a matter of fact I don't think i would take my car to get dynoed except as a participation in a club or social event as i don't race it or tune it myself. I don't even have my car modified in any way yet unless tinting and the sharan antenna would have a miraculously given me me wings.....or was that red bull
    All i can say is, i love gadgets and i love my car and there is this lovely gadget called dynolicious and it gives me an excuse to play with my lovely car. How can i not be interested in that.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Cremorne, Melbourne
    Posts
    2,218
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by shaneth View Post
    get the weights and stuff and illput the same ones in.
    Quote Originally Posted by Y2008 View Post
    We should pick some reasonable weight and stick with it (car+3/4 full tank+75kg driver) just so we can minimise the variables.
    i went to the tip in my car with 2 passengers (myself = 86kg, 'the gf' = about 48kg), 1/4 tank of fuel and i weighed in at 1,320kg from memory.

    Quote Originally Posted by pologti18t View Post
    So... I have little time for people who say "my car got 126.3kw on the dyno". It means nothing.

    If they said...My car recorded 110kw before the mod and 117kw after the mod I would be more impressed.
    what about those that use a dyno for the first time, you couldn't give a rats what figure they get??... pretty harsh really.

    I used two different dyno's on two different days in two completely different weather conditions and i got 122.2kW first go and 123.8kW second go. It was a colder day on the latter test and I was first cab off the rank (8am, compared to 2.30pm on the first test in searing heat). I know there are discrepancies but that seems pretty damn close to me.

    I know dyno's aren't 100% accurate but if that's all we've got to go off, it seems pretty good to me.

    2010 Reflex Silver MK6 Golf GTI
    Sunroof - MDI - Superchip - 19" VMR V710 - Kuhmo Ecsta SPT KU31 - VW Racing Panel Filter

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    223
    Thread Starter
    So i guess 1275kg seems about right.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    223
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by MACCAA View Post
    Stock Polo GTI's generally produce about 95kw at the wheels.
    I weighed my car on a weighbridge and it was 1220kg[cloth trim,no sunroof,1/2 tank fuel]
    Having said that,anyone who takes seriously the figures from something plugged into their cigarette lighter is on drugs....
    Cheers
    Len
    I went for a drive and tried to test it. Was quite hard testing in while staying on the right side of the law. Had a few runs where it didn't record the data properly as the car was moving when i hit start but i managed to get on run where i stopped, pressed start and went. And to be honest i was impressed, as the data made a lot of sense.

    Last edited by Y2008; 05-02-2009 at 12:25 AM.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    223
    Thread Starter

    seem like its not as hit and miss as i thought it would be.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-DFbJQbeSY

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |