Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 58

Thread: Golf R vs WRX vs Evo vs Megane RS250

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,362
    Users Country Flag

    I presume he means not the A3/S3/TT series as they're all using Haldex too.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,009
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by coreying View Post
    I presume he means not the A3/S3/TT series as they're all using Haldex too.
    Correct, they're all East/West drivelines and hence are all Haldex.

    Quote Originally Posted by hooba View Post
    You need to drive the R in order to reassess your opinion on the Haldex.
    I've driven an R32, handled ok but still a massively underwhelming car, still had nothing on a suby and I doubt the R will be any different I'm sorry!!!
    A great car let down by its AWD system

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,618
    Maybe you should drive the R or an upgraded haldex car .

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Witness Protection
    Posts
    728
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by G-rig View Post
    Maybe you should drive the R or an upgraded haldex car .
    You don't need to drive one to be able to offer your opinion on the interwebz.
    --------------------------

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    8,362
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by hooba View Post
    You don't need to drive one to be able to offer your opinion on the interwebz.
    Are you SERIOUS!? You mean people are giving opinions on cars they've never driven... that's just unpossible!

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ferny Grove, QLD
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by coreying View Post
    Are you SERIOUS!? You mean people are giving opinions on cars they've never driven... that's just unpossible!
    Hey this is the interwebz, not only can people have opinions on cars they've never driven they can give you a complete run down of your personality flaws without ever having met you, and PROVE that anything they own is better than anything you will ever own unless it is exactly the same as theirs.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Springwood
    Posts
    253
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Golf Houso View Post
    I've driven an R32, handled ok but still a massively underwhelming car, still had nothing on a suby and I doubt the R will be any different I'm sorry!!!
    A great car let down by its AWD system
    I drove an R32 and it didn't thrill me either.
    Drove an R and i'm sold

    FYI, my daily drive is a Forester on Tein coilovers, so that's what i'm comparing to
    even though the R is 100KG heavier, it felt more balanced and nimble.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Witness Protection
    Posts
    728
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Silverarrow View Post
    Hey this is the interwebz, not only can people have opinions on cars they've never driven they can give you a complete run down of your personality flaws without ever having met you, and PROVE that anything they own is better than anything you will ever own unless it is exactly the same as theirs.
    You're just trying to justify your decision / car by allowing me to delude myself into believing that you are insinuating that I / my car are inferior and react by starting an internet argument with you.

    --------------------------

  9. #49
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Brisbane | QLD
    Posts
    60
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr_Bob View Post
    I drove an R32 and it didn't thrill me either.
    Drove an R and i'm sold

    FYI, my daily drive is a Forester on Tein coilovers, so that's what i'm comparing to
    even though the R is 100KG heavier, it felt more balanced and nimble.
    Hey mate. Are you going for the DSG or manual ?

  10. #50
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    melbourne
    Posts
    2,080

    Quote Originally Posted by team_v View Post
    You lose all of the tracky feel and gain creature comforts like sat nav, leather seats, xenon lights, airbags and have a 4Mo AWD system that isn't as effective as a full time AWD system.
    that shouldnt matter, though.

    i mean, you have all of those creature comforts in a scirocco R which is FWD, and it spanked the evo 10, and simply murdered the STI, around tsukuba raceway.

    this forum is funny. i've never seen so much bagging of VW's on any other forum. but i do find the chipped tiguan vs. golf R discussion to be rather interesting.

    just a question, REXman- i'm genuinely really interested as ive never tracked my cars nor dragged them... you talk about CRAZY nissan silvias, for example, vs. moderately quick german cars like an M3.... yet over the quarter mile, according to your post, there's only 0.5 of a second in it.

    and i've noticed this with other folk as well.... over a quarter mile, is it really a case that a ''worked'' 12.5 second japanese car will be considered BRUTALLY FAST, and yet a german car in close to stock trim, that's only half a second off the pace, will be considered ''quick enough"? for example, i've seen people talk about how brutal big V8's are, and how pathetic all VW's are by comparison...

    yet on hsv forums, people are posting VZ HSV clubsport 13.6sec 0-400m times, and polo drivers with just chip/ dump pipe/ fmic are posting high 13's.... resulting in a whopping 0.2-0.3 seconds being the apparent difference between ''brutal V8 power/ acceleration" and "really quite slow, but a nice, comfortable all-round package".

    cheers,

    scott.
    Last edited by Buller_Scott; 30-06-2010 at 01:50 AM.

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |