Support VWWC

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26

Thread: Sirocco20348 OEM++ Build Thread

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Bairnsdale & Ferntree Gully, Victoria
    Posts
    7,489

    Quote Originally Posted by Sirocco20348 View Post
    Yes these arms would need to be tapped in order to use the stock MK4 sway. But the whole tapping situation seems... Sketchy

    1. It's cast iron metal, not sure if it weakens that area of the arm after being tapped.
    2. The depth of the bolt of the stamped metal arms cannot be achieved on the cast variant.
    3. The bolt has to be trimmed by the looks of things to make it work.

    I'm unsure how much force is applied to the end of a sway bar but the last thing I want to happen is it to crack from hard cornering at the limit.

    I have the entire front suspension from an audi tt so I will be using the thinner sway bar and utilising the drop link attachment points on a new set of struts. No need for tapping and no need to worry.
    Some of the TT arms came with it, pretty sure my set did.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Bairnsdale & Ferntree Gully, Victoria
    Posts
    7,489
    Using the TT setup shouldn't raise the car
    It should just lower the control arm angle.

    If the car became higher it's most likely the old springs were sagged or the new springs were firmer/fresher.
    Or for some reason the new struts had a longer body.
    Or the old bushes were so shagged the car had dropped.
    Or some of the camber tops lift the car compared to bushes.
    Or a combo of some of the above.

    When I out the TT hubs in my car actually got Lower because it stopped the the control arms binding on the subframe

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Batemans bay
    Posts
    142
    Users Country Flag
    Yes it evens the control arm angle out !
    I’ve never thought about it but I can promise it raised the car 1.5 inches over the original Bora hubs with the exact same setup struts.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Bairnsdale & Ferntree Gully, Victoria
    Posts
    7,489
    Odd. Even if the hubs were taller than standard ones it wouldn't lift the car it would just change the angle of the control arms. Something else must be at play
    Last edited by dylan8; 19-08-2019 at 10:28 PM.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Gold Coast, QLD
    Posts
    804
    Users Country Flag Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by dylan8 View Post
    Odd. Even if the hubs were taller than standard ones it wouldn't lift the car it would just change the angle of the struts. Something else must be at play
    I wonder if the kmac camber plates affected anything...

    Here is a comparison of hubs.

    I think I'll have to do some measurements.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Batemans bay
    Posts
    142
    Users Country Flag
    The only thing I changed were the control arms and hubs.
    Everything else was the same as before - kmac tops, kw struts , eibach springs all of which I didn’t touch other than clean and check.
    The wheel alignment was way way out which I thought strange .... but it all aligned properly on the machine with camber added with the lower ball joint and then adjusted out to neg 1.5 at the top. Can’t remember castor settings.
    I thought I’d have to raise it but it was the opposite !!
    Ill think about it .....

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Batemans bay
    Posts
    142
    Users Country Flag
    Done some drawings ....
    The TT hubs move the control arm mounts downwards which levels the arms out.
    That moves the centre point up and in my case lifted the car by exactly the difference in the ball joint location - about 80mm
    Again for me easy fix as I’m running R32 Kw coil overs

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    nsw
    Posts
    3,211
    Users Country Flag
    Its strange. Control arm angles shouldnt affect ride height. I'd say the strut base receiver stopped the strut base sooner or is positioned a bit higher than the stock one relative the wheel spindle?
    Question - do the Mk4 calipers bolt direct to the TT uprights or do you need to carry over the TT calipers. And same with driveshafts - the Mk4 splines match the TT hub?

    Hey Sirocco you couldn't by any chance get the I.Dmm of the TT uprights strut receiver could you. I guess with it tightened up a bit to simulate a strut being in there.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Batemans bay
    Posts
    142
    Users Country Flag

    Just looking at the two here you can see that the TT hub is longer .... that’s why it lifts the car up.
    Bilstein list different struts for R32 and Bora - same specs other than the spring platform is lower for the R32 ...
    Brakes bolt up .... splines are identical as are wheel bearings, abs rings and sensors ...
    Lower ball joint is bigger overall and the tie rod is just rotated 180 deg
    The reason my alignment was so far out initially was the dramatic change in the height of the steering arms ....
    I reckon the steering is lighter since the conversion ... although the castor setting is different as well.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    nsw
    Posts
    3,211
    Users Country Flag

    Sorry for the thread highjack Sirocco..

    Thanks LeStig. Being a lower ball joint position compared to the stock hub, it would make the King Pin inclination (KPI) slightly more upright which would move the scrub radius in the positive direction. May even still be negative scrub but I'd think it'd move the scrub more inboard across the tyre which would affect steering feel. Did you have more/less/same tyre clearance against the strut tube afterwards?
    I'm looking to put these into a 9N3 Polo Gti. I've already moified my lower control arms to carry TT ball joints (which fit the Polo hub) so I know they'll fit into TT hubs. Even if I have to change tie rod ends that wont be a big deal. For me it'll be a question of if the splines/ABS ring/sensor carry over and if the Polo's strut tube base is the correct diameter. I have MCA's so if the base diameter isn't correct I should be able to get a different mk 4 golf base to thread onto the tube anyway, but if they'd fit as is that'd be lovely. Height adjustment wont be an issue being coilovers, just if the struts will fit.
    very glad someones doing/done this. I'll be watching!

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |