Support VWWC

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: Has anyone tuned ECU on 2.0L Golf?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Perth -Yokine
    Posts
    53

    Question Has anyone tuned ECU on 2.0L Golf?

    A company called super chip offer an 8kw gain for $550... Is it just me or is that a lot of money for not much gain?

    I’m just thinking an extra 8 kw would put my 10yr old dub up to 93 kw… that’s not bad! But is that worth the $550 and on top of that how much fuel economy do I lose for that 8kw?

    How much does ECU tuning usually change your use economy? To that point how much does it change your car in general?

    final question does ECU tuning wreck your engine?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Mexico
    Posts
    8,995
    Users Country Flag
    What are you really expecting to get for your $550?

    There's next to no power locked up in a 2 litre normally aspirated engine. If you are after VFM with flash tuning, you need to get something with a turbo.

    It's not just about the increase in power but the improvement in drivability. What you would see is more area under the curve on a dyno graph.

    The tuning won't damage anything.

    Any loss in fuel consumption would be down to you driving the car differently.

    Gavin

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,114
    Quote Originally Posted by Golf88 View Post
    A company called super chip offer an 8kw gain for $550... Is it just me or is that a lot of money for not much gain?

    I’m just thinking an extra 8 kw would put my 10yr old dub up to 93 kw… that’s not bad! But is that worth the $550 and on top of that how much fuel economy do I lose for that 8kw?

    How much does ECU tuning usually change your use economy? To that point how much does it change your car in general?

    final question does ECU tuning wreck your engine?
    your better off with head work/port work/and cams if anything .. leave the ecu for the last thing.

    superchip = supercrap IMO. i have a fair few dyno graphs to prove bang for farked instead of bang for buck, harsh but reality as i wouldnt want someone to spend money and get nothing out of it.
    What’s behind you doesn’t matter..

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,114
    get in touch with Vince http://www.vwwatercooled.org.au/newf...ad.php?t=27134

    he made some godo numbers for a 2.0 on the dyno last 2 times
    What’s behind you doesn’t matter..

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, Southside...
    Posts
    2,514
    Users Country Flag
    Chris (that's his username as well) on here also used to have a 2L with some headwork and all that kind of crazy stuff. Not sure of the numbers he put down but worth having a chat with him for what he did and the kind of money he spent.
    Cheers,
    Trent

    2010 Renault Clio RenaultSPORT 200 Cup 20th Anniversary Edition - #19 of 30 - The French Connection...
    2004 Volkswagen Golf R32 MkIV - #044 of 200 - Gone But Not Forgotten...
    "Racing is life; Anything that happens before or after is just waiting." - Steve McQueen -=-=- "Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum" - Unknown

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,043
    Don't bother wasting your time.

    If you want a fast car, save your money for a fast car.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    209
    Check this out for an overview of chipping.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLvvxMCUo5E

    Not worth it at all on NA cars. The real benefit comes from boost and timing on turbo charged engines.

    Also 8KW 'CLAIMED' increase would be the absolute maximum they EVER achieved to be able to advertise that.

    To be honest I think the difference (if there was any) would be unnoticeable.

    While making the above video we did a lot of research and interviews before we shot. A number of dyno mechanics told us that NA cars that came in for a dyno run after a chip upgrade had LOST power.


    MK4 GTI | MK5 Sportline | 08 Audi S3

    Modify your ride with free DIY videos at www.mightycarmods.com

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, Southside...
    Posts
    2,514
    Users Country Flag
    Quote Originally Posted by blue_reality View Post
    Not worth it at all on NA cars. The real benefit comes from boost and timing on turbo charged engines.
    Also 8KW 'CLAIMED' increase would be the absolute maximum they EVER achieved to be able to advertise that.
    To be honest I think the difference (if there was any) would be unnoticeable.
    While making the above video we did a lot of research and interviews before we shot. A number of dyno mechanics told us that NA cars that came in for a dyno run after a chip upgrade had LOST power.
    It's not necessarily about power all the time though. The MkIV R32 has a power hole just below 3000rpm which only chipping can fix.
    Yes power gains are only ever minimal but a lot of the time they improve driveability and give a much better power band across the entire rev range.
    Cheers,
    Trent

    2010 Renault Clio RenaultSPORT 200 Cup 20th Anniversary Edition - #19 of 30 - The French Connection...
    2004 Volkswagen Golf R32 MkIV - #044 of 200 - Gone But Not Forgotten...
    "Racing is life; Anything that happens before or after is just waiting." - Steve McQueen -=-=- "Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum" - Unknown

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Perth -Yokine
    Posts
    53
    Thread Starter

    Unhappy

    Hey guys thanks for the advise, the feedback is this is going to be close to pointless.. not just in terms of KW but there just isnt much my NA 2.0 can give. maybe if the revo software was in WA i would do that, they claim to have gains of up to 16KW and its still around the $600 mark.

    The whole thing isnt about tuning my car to be sporty but it would be good if i could get the power up to the level of todays 2.0 engines like the ford focus and mazda 3, they are both about 110KW. My last car was an 07 ford focus and the only thing the ford had on the golf was its power...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    2,636
    Users Country Flag

    Quote Originally Posted by blue_reality View Post
    Not worth it at all on NA cars.
    I think that's a bit broad. There are *some* gains to be had through chipping, but not a lot of peak power. Improvements when chipping NA cars are generally down to economy and driveability - smoother power/torque curves and wider curves rather than higher ones (for a broader spread of power/torque.

    I'm currently considering a Custom-Code tune of my Bora V6 4Motion. If I get it done, I plan on having it dynoed before and after, which should show where the improvements are.

    What's almost certainly true is that chipping forced induction cars (turbo and super charged) tends to give greater gains.
    Nothing to see here...

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
| |