View Full Version : Mercedes up's the diesel war!
Greg Roles
12-12-2008, 03:38 PM
Geezus!
http://autospeed.com/cms/A_110964/article.html
2.14 litre 150kw and 500nm twin turbo diesel beastie!
Hope the rumoured twin turbo TDI chases these guys!
gregozedobe
12-12-2008, 03:58 PM
Pretty impressive torque figures, but I don't think I'd like to own one (and be paying for repairs) of the twin turbo setup when it was 10 years old and had 240,000Km on the clock. (but I am a bit conservative with new technology) :)
Pretty impressive torque figures, but I don't think I'd like to own one (and be paying for repairs) of the twin turbo setup when it was 10 years old and had 240,000Km on the clock. (but I am a bit conservative with new technology) :)
Your basic Mercedes owner with a rolling novated lease probably doesn't care too much :)
That said, it'd probably be pretty reliable. MB engines tend to be overengineered.
Greg Roles
12-12-2008, 08:34 PM
Five f@#$ing hundred newtons and you are quibbling over long term repair bills? Slap yourself Greggo!! Where do I get one???
My FPV GT had 520nm, and was a blast in an 1800kg car!
GEZUS!:eek:
Pumpe-Düse
13-12-2008, 01:15 AM
Five f@#$ing hundred newtons and you are quibbling over long term repair bills? Slap yourself Greggo!! Where do I get one???
My FPV GT had 520nm, and was a blast in an 1800kg car!
GEZUS!:eek:
Even with all that torque, the Mercedes is still pretty slow. 7.0 sec 0-100km/h. Yay for 500Nm but unable to beat your average BA Falcon taxi. Which costs less to run (LPG). Ouch.
Give me the FPV GT's 520Nm any day. :D
Transporter
13-12-2008, 06:44 AM
Even with all that torque, the Mercedes is still pretty slow. 7.0 sec 0-100km/h. Yay for 500Nm but unable to beat your average BA Falcon taxi. Which costs less to run (LPG). Ouch.
Give me the FPV GT's 520Nm any day. :D
Don't speek before you drive it.
Give me MB any day before Ford.
What is Falcon FPV GT? :duh:
Greg Roles
13-12-2008, 06:50 AM
A 5.4L twin cam V8 Ford that whilst a whole lot of blokey fun, pales in quality compared to a south african assembled Golf in my opinion. I used to average 17L/100k too!! The car i traded on the Golf, and so glad I did now given the price of fuel and fall in price of thirsty cars.
All I miss is the sound.
http://www.vwwatercooled.com.au/forums/images/imported/2008/12/2008_0227Image0005-2.jpg
benough
15-12-2008, 02:59 PM
See the dynograph?
The torque curve drops like a lead ballon, no thanks!
Oneofthegreats
15-12-2008, 03:15 PM
I think some of you may have looked past the fact that this is only 2.14L
That's an amazing effort considering only a couple of year's ago BMW's 3.0L 6 cyl. was making that!
GoLfMan
15-12-2008, 03:54 PM
thats huge numbers from a relatively small capacity diesel....
some of you fellas need to think before shooting something down like that!
linds
18-12-2008, 10:58 PM
damn, the amount of technology in that is astonishing, however I'm wary of the repairs when something does eventually break, despite MB's heavy engineering and testing...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.